[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110429164951.GB25491@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:49:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>
Subject: Re: re-enable Nehalem raw Offcore-Events support
* Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:04:46AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > Hello Linus
> >
> > can you revert the commit b52c55c6a25e4515b5e075a989ff346fc251ed09
>
> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
I outlined my objections in my reply to Vince.
> (I wrote the original patch)
>
> > (finally!) added in the 2.6.39 merge window. However this is a useful
> > feature and many tools (including the PAPI performance counter library
> > that I work on) had added support for it in anticipation of the 2.6.39
>
> I also use some tools which benefit from this functionality. The extended raw
> events are very useful to analyze NUMA problems for once.
Mind sharing those methods and help generalizing them and help making them
useful to non-experts? Peter's patch which adds a 'NUMA' level to the cache
event abstractions could be a good start.
Only once generalization has been covered sufficiently, once we are sure we can
stick with the raw ABI, can we push that upstream.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists