[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110429201241.GA12256@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:12:42 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:54:27AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:32:17 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > As the commit message suggests, per-arch cpufreq drivers are moving to drivers/cpufreq/
> > So far, I've only moved the x86 ones. As a side-effect of this, the
> > source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig" is no longer a per-arch thing, as it now gets
> > included from kernel/power/Kconfig.
> >
> > I suspect the warnings are happening because on the unconverted archs, drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> > is now getting included twice. If you kill the 'source' line in kernel/power/Kconfig,
> > does this make things go back to normal ? (Check that cpufreq still shows up in
> > the resulting config afterwards)
>
> Removing the source line in kernel/power/Kconfig makes the warnings go
> away and the only change in the generated config file is this:
I've moved this work onto a separate move-drivers branch. Could you track that in next too please?
(Apply after fixes & next)
I'm hoping this branch will be fairly short-lived, but it depends how quickly
other architecture maintainers move their drivers over too.
thanks,
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists