linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/25] x86, NUMA: trivial cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DBC37D0.3070408@kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:24:48 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	mingo@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/25] x86, NUMA: trivial cleanups

On 04/30/2011 05:03 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:25:44AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 04/29/2011 08:28 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> * Kill no longer used struct bootnode.
>>>
>>> * Kill dangling declaration of pxm_to_nid() in numa_32.h.
>>>
>>> * Make setup_node_bootmem() static.
>>
>> first one and third one should appear in patches that I posted before.
> 
> Sorry, can't understand what you mean.  What are you trying to say?
> 

I posted two patches for 
Kill no longer used struct bootnode.
Make setup_node_bootmem() static

Also setup_node_bootmem now is some misleading, could change to setup_node_data() ?

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/