[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110501234911.GI13542@dastard>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 09:49:11 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com, patches@...ro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Preview of RCU patches for 2.6.40
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:21:42AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This patchset introduces RCU_TREE priority boosting, a new "fire and
> forget" kfree_rcu() API, numerous uses of kfree_rcu(), plus a number
> of other fixes and improvements. The patches are as follows:
.....
> 34-70. Use kfree_rcu() throughout the kernel. This set of patches has
> Acked-by's, so will go up -tip.
>
> 71-86. Ditto, but lacking Acked-by's.
Any reason why dentry and inode freeing was not converted in this
series?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists