[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110501032507.GA21118@localhost>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 11:25:07 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmotm: fix hang at startup
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 10:35:38AM +0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Yesterday's mmotm hangs at startup, and with lockdep it reports:
> BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#1, blkid/284 - with bdi_lock_two()
> called from bdev_inode_switch_bdi() in the backtrace. It appears
> that this function is sometimes called with new the same as old.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> Fix to
> writeback-split-inode_wb_list_lock-into-bdi_writebacklist_lock.patch
>
> fs/block_dev.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> --- 2.6.39-rc5-mm1/fs/block_dev.c 2011-04-29 18:20:09.183314733 -0700
> +++ linux/fs/block_dev.c 2011-04-30 17:55:45.718785263 -0700
> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ static void bdev_inode_switch_bdi(struct
> {
> struct backing_dev_info *old = inode->i_data.backing_dev_info;
>
> + if (dst == old)
> + return;
nitpick: it could help to add a comment
/* avoid spinlock recursion */
to indicate that's not merely an optional optimization, but indeed
required for correctness.
Thanks,
Fengguang
> bdi_lock_two(&old->wb, &dst->wb);
> spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> inode->i_data.backing_dev_info = dst;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists