[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110502193820.2D60.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 19:37:30 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Filter unevictable page out in deactivate_page
> It's pointless that deactive_page's pagevec operation about
> unevictable page as it's nop.
> This patch removes unnecessary overhead which might be a bit problem
> in case that there are many unevictable page in system(ex, mprotect workload)
>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/swap.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> index 2e9656d..b707694 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.c
> +++ b/mm/swap.c
> @@ -511,6 +511,15 @@ static void drain_cpu_pagevecs(int cpu)
> */
> void deactivate_page(struct page *page)
> {
> +
> + /*
> + * In workload which system has many unevictable page(ex, mprotect),
> + * unevictalge page deactivation for accelerating reclaim
> + * is pointless.
> + */
> + if (PageUnevictable(page))
> + return;
> +
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
btw, I think we should check PageLRU too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists