[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201105021326.09725.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 13:26:09 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC] ARM DMA mapping TODO, v1
On Monday 02 May 2011, David Brown wrote:
> I'll confirm this from the Qualcomm side as well. You cannot have
> multiple inconsistent mappings of the same page without having difficult
> to find problems.
I believe Catalin was referring to the case where you have only
one nonconsistent (cacheable) mapping plus multiple consistent
(cacheable) mappings. I don't think anyone has suggested doing
DMA to a page that has multiple nonconsistent mappings with
virtually indexed caches.
> The spec clarifications appear to give ways of dealing with it if it
> happens, and bounds on what can go wrong, but I wouldn't call it
> something we want to do normally. Corrupt data is arguably less of a
> problem than nasal demons, but still a problem.
Anything that has a theoretical chance of corrupting data is not an
option, but I'd really like to see what the clarified spec says
about this. Even if there is a way to legally leave a page for
dma_alloc_coherent in the linear mapping, it might turn out to
be harder to do than using highmem pages or unmapping supersections
at run time as was suggested.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists