[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110502193436.GA14666@dumpdata.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 15:34:36 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, yinghai@...nel.org,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Two patches fixing regression introduced
by 'x86-64, mm: Put early page table high'
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:33:16AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/02/2011 11:08 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>
> >> My inclination would be to apply your workaround -- are there any
> >> adverse effects to doing that?
> >
> > There is a bootup slowdown (not noticeable). That is because we call the
> > 'memblock_find_range' function on every PTE table creation (only during
> > bootup of course).
> >
> > Testing wise, on the machines on which the regression occurred, with these two
> > patches the regression disappears - so that is a good sign. I am testing
> > it on some more today to assure myself I am not missing anything.
> >
>
> OK, sounds like a plan then. I like it because it doesn't affect the
> native kernel.
<laughs> I figured :-)
Moving forward I really want to get rid of this wart.
Not sure if it is possible, but I was thinking it would be nice to get
you, Yinghai, Jeremy, Stefano all in one place (phone or web-conference thing)
to sketch out some ideas and hammer something out.
What days would work best?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists