[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1105021247410.18728@trent.utfs.org>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 12:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com,
minchan.kim@...il.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks
On Mon, 2 May 2011 at 22:19, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Yes. Try 2 orders of magnitude as a start. i.e change it to 10000...
I've run the -12 test with vfs_cache_pressure=200 and now the -13 test
with vfs_cache_pressure=10000. The OOM killer still kicks in, but the
machine seems to be more usable afterwards and does not get totally stuck:
http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.39-rc4/oom/
- messages-12.txt.gz & slabinfo-12.txt.bz2
* oom-debug.sh invoked oom-killer at 01:27:11
* sysrq-w works until 01:27:08, but got killed by oom
- messages-13.txt.gz & slabinfo-13.txt.bz2
* find invoked oom-killer at 08:44:07
* sysrq-w works until 08:45:48 (listing jbd2/hda6-8), then
my debug script got killed
Thanks,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #224:
Jan 9 16:41:27 huber su: 'su root' succeeded for .... on /dev/pts/1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists