linux-kernel - Re: [Stable-review] [36/55] [PARISC] slub: fix panic with DISCONTIGMEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1304366677.2833.170.camel@localhost>
Date:	Mon, 02 May 2011 21:04:37 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...glemail.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Stable-review] [36/55] [PARISC] slub: fix panic with
 DISCONTIGMEM

On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 11:55 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> 2.6.38-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
> 
> commit 4a5fa3590f09999f6db41bc386bce40848fa9f63 upstream.
> 
> Slub makes assumptions about page_to_nid() which are violated by
> DISCONTIGMEM and !NUMA.  This violation results in a panic because
> page_to_nid() can be non-zero for pages in the discontiguous ranges and
> this leads to a null return by get_node().  The assertion by the
> maintainer is that DISCONTIGMEM should only be allowed when NUMA is also
> defined.  However, at least six architectures: alpha, ia64, m32r, m68k,
> mips, parisc violate this.  The panic is a regression against slab, so
> just mark slub broken in the problem configuration to prevent users
> reporting these panics.

This stable series also included the patches:

commit 6a682f634ba9615d3498d1e20a23e9d4fcb39f16
Author: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Date:   Wed Apr 20 19:27:13 2011 -0700

    set memory ranges in N_NORMAL_MEMORY when onlined
    
    commit d9b41e0b54fd7e164daf1e9c539c1070398aa02e upstream.

commit 8858587af25efc06d5cce42676786b3d7a9160f2
Author: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...glemail.com>
Date:   Tue Apr 26 14:51:53 2011 +1200

    m68k/mm: Set all online nodes in N_NORMAL_MEMORY
    
    commit 4aac0b4815ba592052758f4b468f253d383dc9d6 upstream.

which look like they're supposed to make slub work on these two
architectures (parisc and m68k).  Do they?  If not, do they fix a
different problem?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)