[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikfueeOr2D7TO5uyG=L3A-dbEsUyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:43:17 +0200
From: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Octavian Purdila <tavi@...pub.ro>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/69] faster tree-based sysctl implementation
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> Do you also have a lot of network namespaces in the workloads you care
> about?
No, the usecase deals with high number of netdevices.
The cookie can be used in lots of places that kmemdup ctl_table arrays
and then set ->data to be the address of a member of a structure.
- netdevice config sysctls
- netns specific sysctls (e.g. net/somaxconn
- parport device specific sysctls
- cpu sched domain config sysctls
- et. al.
I sent another series sometime in February that added the cookie to
ipv4/6 conf sysctls.
I don't know why I did not include that in the patch series from April.
> The cookie changes seem particularly intrusive, and if I read your
> patches properly the cookies are only useful for table sharing when
> implementing network namespaces. At first glance those changes seem
> pretty horrible.
I know it's ugly. I was thinking about this today. I think I have a
cleaner solution, that I'll post after this patch series.
--
.
..: Lucian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists