linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/86] rcu: Add boosting to TREE_PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 May 2011 15:19:59 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
	patches@...aro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/86] rcu: Add boosting to
 TREE_PREEMPT_RCU tracing

On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 10:53:57AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:27:11AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:52:25AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:20:51AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > From: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
> > > > 
> > > > Includes total number of tasks boosted, number boosted on behalf of each
> > > > of normal and expedited grace periods, and statistics on attempts to
> > > > initiate boosting that failed for various reasons.
> > > 
> > > In this patch series, you have several cases where you improve the trace
> > > output in one patch, and then update the documentation in a subsequent
> > > patch.  You might consider doing both in the same patch, so that at each
> > > step the documentation matches the kernel.
> > 
> > The reason I do the documentation second is that it allows me to copy
> > the exact output from a test run, which has the nice side-effect of
> > making sure that I really am getting the documentation correct.  Or at
> > least of reducing the probability of getting it wrong...  ;-)
> 
> I definitely agree that you should copy the output from a test run to
> make the documentation accurate; I just mean that once you do so, you
> should put both the code changes and corresponding documentation into a
> single commit.

Fair enough, I did some squashing.

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/