linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SOC: UDA134x: Enable POWER_OFF_ON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110503112350.GG1762@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 May 2011 12:23:50 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Belisko Marek <marek.belisko@...il.com>
Cc:	tiwai@...e.de, perex@...ex.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, lrg@...mlogic.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SOC: UDA134x: Enable POWER_OFF_ON_STANDBY define.

On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 01:09:27PM +0200, Belisko Marek wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Mark Brown

> > If this is essential why is it optional in the first place?

> Not sure about background. Maybe whole define should be removed

That's exactly what I'm suggesting.

> This change was introduced in commit:f0fba2ad

*Always* include a plain text description of the commit for those of us
who haven't memorised the entire git history.  In this case I suspect
you need to do a bit more digging, that commit will just have done some
code motion here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/