[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikA-oP9ftAE_TXQdU5yBObgn2KG=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 09:53:58 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: cut down __GFP_NORETRY page allocation failures
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:14 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:35:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>
>> > Do you see my old patch? The patch want't incomplet but it's not bad for showing an idea.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> typo : wasn't complete
>
> I think your idea is eligible. Wu's approach may increase throughput but
Yes. it doesn't change many subtle things and make much fair but the
Wu's concern is order-0 pages with __GFP_NORETRY. By his experiment,
my patch doesn't help much his concern.
The problem I have is I don't have any infrastructure for reproducing
his experiment. :(
> may decrease latency. So, do you have a plan to finish the work?
I want it but the day would be after finishing inorder-putback series. :)
Maybe you have a environment(8core system). If you want it, go ahead. :)
Thanks, KOSAKI.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists