linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: add support for MOXA V2100 watchdog driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 May 2011 14:35:01 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>, jimmy.chen@...a.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	wim@...ana.be
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: add support for MOXA V2100 watchdog
 driver

> Another thing that might be nice here is to have one module that probes
> the superio-port and then registers a platform device that other drivers

That doesn't help. See the it87 request_muxed patches pending. Because
the port can be muxed we need to actually implement port muxing across
the super I/O devices. That's a separate and larger problem altogether
and this device will get fixed as we do the other so not a problem.

> can can bind to. Right now, you have to load the module manually and
> then check if it's there, something we no longer do for most devices.

A lot of these super I/O devices have no entirely safe autodetect, and
the same is true for it87 and many others. There isn't a nice elegant
solution really.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/