[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110503141345.GB8056@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 07:13:45 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonas Fonseca <jonas.fonseca@...oirfairelinux.com>,
platform-driver-x86 <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] platform-drivers-x86: add support for Technologic
Systems TS-5xxx detection
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:39:19AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > I had a look at other drivers, and /sys/devices/platform/ts/ seems to be
> > > a good place to hold those entries (one per options as you suggested).
> > > Do you agree with that?
> >
> > No, this is not a platform device, is it? Only platform devices go
> > there, and I really doubt you have many of them for this board.
>
> It seems analogous to some of the laptop helpers so I don't think it is
> that unreasonable to make the board config a platform device of its own -
> we don't really have a general solution to the board as a device, so if
> you look at equivalents on laptops and the like we have assorted platform
> control interfaces that are platform devices.
Platform control devices are great, I have no objection to that. I do
object to random proc files to try to describe the fact that this board
has a rs232 port on it, when that is able to be determined elsewhere.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists