linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch 29/32] trace event asoc remove semicolons

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 May 2011 15:14:37 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 29/32] trace event asoc remove semicolons

On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:06:47AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Mark Brown (broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com) wrote:

> > This is an unrelated change and should be split out.  Frankly I'm not
> > that this is an improvement anyway, the struct declarations aren't going
> > to do any harm...

> Yes, this change is related, because these declarations will cause harm.
> The structure declaration cannot be put within an array declaration,
> because then they won't be simply "ignored": they will try to declare
> structures within an array, which is not valid. This is why I did this
> change in the same patch.

This might make a bit more sense if we'd seen the earlier or possibly
later patches...  According to the patch description all you're doing
here is removing the semicolons.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/