[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1304436872.25414.2403.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 11:34:32 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
EDAC devel <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Petkov, Borislav" <Borislav.Petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86, mce: Add persistent MCE event
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 17:22 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:14:16AM -0400, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 09:18 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:44:01AM -0400, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org> wrote:
> > []
> > > > > +static struct dentry *mce_add_event_debugfs(struct perf_event *event, int cpu)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + char buf[14];
There should be no harm in upping that number to 32. (I've seen much
worse on stacks).
> > > > > +
> > > > > + sprintf(buf, "mce_record%d", cpu);
At least change this to:
snprintf(buf, 14, ....)
> >
> > trivia:
> >
> > buf[14] doesn't fit 10k+ cpus.
>
> I'll fix that when someone comes up with a x86 system that supports 10k+
> CPUs with a single system image :).
>
Best to fix it now, to save the trouble of finding this bug for those
that are maintaining this code long after we have retired or are dead ;)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists