[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wri73i6e.fsf@synack.fr>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 17:41:45 +0200
From: Samir Bellabes <sam@...ack.fr>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, hadi@...erus.ca, kaber@...sh.net,
zbr@...emap.net, root@...aldomain.pl
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 01/10] lsm: add security_socket_closed()
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp> writes:
> Samir Bellabes wrote:
>> Allow a module to update security informations when a socket is closed.
> Is security_inode_free() too late for doing it?
>
> static void ccs_inode_free_security(struct inode *inode)
> {
> if (inode->i_sb && inode->i_sb->s_magic == SOCKFS_MAGIC)
> ccs_update_socket_tag(inode, 0);
> }
I don't think it's too late.
But in sock_close() we are sure to deal with a inode which is a socket.
In ccs_inode_free_security(), we need to add small to check if the inode
is a socket or something else.
sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists