[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110503165751.GA6566@bart.evergreen.loc>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 18:57:51 +0200
From: L. Alberto Giménez <agimenez@...valve.es>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dgiagio@...il.com, dborca@...oo.com,
davem@...emloft.net, pmcenery@...il.com, david.hill@...soft.com,
"open list:USB SUBSYSTEM" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipheth.c: Enable IP header alignment
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 10:04:34PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> So this was using NET_IP_ALIGN as an offset into the URB. Which was
> totally bogus, as its value has long been architecture-dependent. The
> code is also claiming to put len bytes but only copying len - delta.
>
> The correct code would be something like:
>
> if (urb->actual_length <= IPHETH_IP_ALIGN) {
> dev->net->stats.rx_length_errors++;
> return;
> }
> len = urb->actual_length - IPHETH_IP_ALIGN;
> buf = urb->transfer_buffer + IPHETH_IP_ALIGN;
>
> dev_alloc_skb(len);
> ...
> memcpy(skb_put(skb, len), buf, len);
Thanks for the response Ben.
I can try to change the code, but I don't own the device anymore. Changing the
code without being able to test it would be walking blindfolded :-/
If upstrem (everyone involved is in CC) can't do it, I can submit the changes
advised by Ben, but I can't warantee anything beyond successful compilation. I
don't think that it would be acceptable here.
Regards,
--
L. Alberto Giménez
JabberID agimenez@...ber.sysvalve.es
GnuPG key ID 0x3BAABDE1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists