[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301C53670E0@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 10:17:50 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
EDAC devel <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Petkov, Borislav" <Borislav.Petkov@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] x86, mce: Have MCE persistent event off by default
for now
> Ok, the problem I see with it is that people without a RAS daemon
> running will have the mechanism collecting MCEs in the background, using
> up resources (4 pages per CPU is the buffer) and not doing anything (in
> the best case that is, when we're not broken otherwise).
Can the kernel detect whether anyone is listening to the
persistent MCE event? If so, then the kernel could printk()
something to let the user with no RAS daemon (or a dead
daemon) that stuff is happening that they might like to
know about.
Probably make some sense to delay such a message (so that in
the boot case we give the daemon a chance to get started before
complaining that it hasn't shown up for work).
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists