[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110503173011.GE1762@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 18:30:12 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com, lrg@...com,
Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>, grant.likely@...retlab.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] TPS65911: Add new irq definitions
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:18:56AM -0500, Jorge Eduardo Candelaria wrote:
> + if (tps65910_chip_id(tps65910) == TPS65911) {
> + tps65910->read(tps65910, TPS65910_INT_STS3, 1, ®);
> + irq_sts |= reg << 16;
> + }
switch statements feel better for future proofing - if your hardware
guys do another design derived from this base you'll need to add another
case in here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists