[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <975406B8-5A4D-4C71-85D0-A4352069CB6D@niasdigital.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 11:47:59 +1000
From: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Martin Persson <martin.persson@...ricsson.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers: create a pinmux subsystem
On 03/05/2011, at 5:16 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> This creates a subsystem for handling of pinmux devices. These are
> devices that enable and disable groups of pins on primarily PGA and
> BGA type of chip packages and common in embedded systems.
>
> This is being done to depopulate the arch/arm/* directory of such
> custom drivers and try to abstract the infrastructure they all
> need. See the Documentation/pinmux.txt file that is part of this
> patch for more details.
Haven't reviewed the actual code but at an interface level it seems
sane. It'd be nice to actually implement a driver for some nutbars SoC
and make sure it all shakes out but in the first instance I can't see
any problems.
Leaving it orthogonal to gpio is a great move conceptually and if it does
need to be tied back to the gpio_request() interface later then, well,
we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
Thanks for your work in this area, looking good.
--Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists