[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=6_oXX1BM5O3kJ6bVevh9=ydjj3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 13:17:36 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: werner <w.landgraf@...ru>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc5-git2 boot crashs
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> I have no smart ideas straight away - just an observation: i keep testing
> CONFIG_X86_ELAN=y on real hardware, and it's enabled in about 4% of my configs:
So how often do you do more than just boot?
Because this problem doesn't happen at boot-time, the "bad IO" issue
seems to happen only after some real filesystem work (ie the "unzip a
140MB file" etc). In one of the logs, the SATA driver issue ended up
happening four hours after boot (but I think Werner could trigger it
in minutes by doing heavy FS work).
That's why I'd suspect some subtle race or other and/or memory
allocation re-use.
The subject line "boot crashs" is misleading, because that's the
unrelated logfs thing that I have a tentative patch for.
That said, I don't really see why ELAN would be so special.
Werner: can you test without X86_EXTENDED_PLATFORM, but then picking
the i486 config instead? That should approximate the ELAN
configuration pretty closely, at least in things like compiler flags..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists