[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110503205051.GA28647@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 22:50:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
werner <w.landgraf@...ru>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc5-git2 boot crashs
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 01:17 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > That said, I don't really see why ELAN would be so special.
> >
>
> ELAN used to have a nonstandard A20 enabling sequence, until someone
> found out that changes to the mainline sequence had made ELAN work as a
> side effect.
>
> At this point, it's just a CPU selection thing, so it makes very little
> sense.
the ELAN .config option influences the following details:
- sets X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 4 (16 bytes) instead of the typical 6 (64 bytes)
- sets X86_ALIGNMENT_16
- sets the -march=i486 compiler flag
So in terms of the kernel image it seems to be mostly equivalent to selecting
i486 from the CPU menu - except the X86_ALIGNMENT_16 detail (which does not
seem to do anything substantive, AFAICS).
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists