linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch 29/32] trace event asoc remove semicolons

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110503213004.GI32331@Krystal>
Date:	Tue, 3 May 2011 17:30:04 -0400
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 29/32] trace event asoc remove semicolons

* Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com) wrote:
> * Mark Brown (broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:14:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:06:47AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > 
> > > > Yes, this change is related, because these declarations will cause harm.
> > > > The structure declaration cannot be put within an array declaration,
> > > > because then they won't be simply "ignored": they will try to declare
> > > > structures within an array, which is not valid. This is why I did this
> > > > change in the same patch.
> > 
> > > This might make a bit more sense if we'd seen the earlier or possibly
> > > later patches...  According to the patch description all you're doing
> > > here is removing the semicolons.
> > 
> > OK, now I see patch 1 I understand why you're doing this.  It should
> > still be at least called out in the patch description if not actually
> > split out into a separate patch (which would be ideal) - one of the
> > things that really stands out in reviews is unrelated changes.
> 
> Due to the large number of patches (32 overall), I prefer not to overdo
> it in terms of splitting changes to each individual subsystem in even
> more patches. If it's OK with you, I'll just clarify the changelog.

Please disregard this message, since Steven showed me the light. ;-)

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mathieu
> 
> -- 
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/