[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110503061335.GA7751@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 08:13:35 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
patches@...aro.org, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/7] net,rcu: convert
call_rcu(sk_filter_release_rcu) to kfree_rcu
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:41:56PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 09:13:38 -0700
> >
> > > The RCU callback sk_filter_release_rcu just calls kfree(), so we use
> > > kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > I'm fine with all of these net conversions:
> >
> > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> Thank you, Dave!
Looking at the networking-only diffstat i suspect the best flow would be if
Dave pulled these from you into the networking tree?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists