linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] writeback fixes and trace events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 May 2011 20:06:09 +1000
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] writeback fixes and trace events

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:56:37PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:46:54PM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:17:07PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > Andrew,
> > > 
> > > Here are one more collection of simple writeback patches.
> > 
> > How does this relate to the other floating writeback patches?  We
> > really need a proper writeback tree to make any sense of the patch
> > queues..
> 
> These patches are based on the writeback patches already in -mm.
> Sorry I should have mentioned it.

Does anyone actaully testing filesystems use the -mm tree? I'm
pretty sure that no-one in the XFS world does, and I don't think
that any ext4 or btrfs folk do, either....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/