[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110504111722.GB19261@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 07:17:22 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Mel Gorman <mel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@...bb4u.ne.jp>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] writeback: elevate queue_io() into wb_writeback()
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 07:15:47PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > This should move to writeback_inodes_wb and be unconditional as
> > wb_writeback already always initializes it.
>
> Never mind :) wbc->wb_start has been killed in a later patch named
> "writeback: avoid extra sync work at enqueue time".
Even better. I was already wondering why we'd need two different
jiffies and jiffies + offset value in the writeback code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists