[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110504165021.GA1404@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 18:50:21 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
werner <w.landgraf@...ru>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [block IO crash] Re: 2.6.39-rc5-git2 boot crashs
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> My gut reaction would be: let's do the minimal patch that just fixes things
> to do irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_double() for 2.6.39, and then let's remove the
> #ifdef'fery in -rc1. [...]
Looks like the sanest option IMHO, -rc7 is pretty late for anything than a
few-liner patch.
> [...] Or make _really_ sure that things are ok for platforms that never even
> triggered the CMPXCHG_LOCAL case before.
Considering that the status quo was !CMPXCHG_LOCAL in v2.6.38 and that lockless
SLUB is an x86-only affair right now:
$ git grep CMPXCHG_LOCAL arch/
arch/um/Kconfig.x86:config CMPXCHG_LOCAL
arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu:config CMPXCHG_LOCAL
There should be no problem with other architectures, right?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists