[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105041158020.22426@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 12:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] m68k SLUB fix for 2.6.39
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> As i have explained multiple times before: This is a generic issue with a
> kernel configuration that has DISCONTIGMEM on and NUMA configured off.
> Core code in various subsystems makes various assumptions in the !NUMA
> case. F.e. page_to_nid(page) == 0. Slub is one of them.
>
Agreed, but James is still reporting that there is a slub oops with at
least parisc even with the N_NORMAL_MEMORY fix applied. He's currently
retrying on a clean kernel with the latest git (and presumably
CONFIG_BROKEN to enable CONFIG_SLUB). If he reports that slub is no
longer an issue with such a configuration, then I agree that we can remove
the Kconfig change for slub so it no longer forces CONFIG_NUMA for
CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM (or CONFIG_BROKEN).
If that's the case, and we'll have to wait for James' report back first,
then we can probably make adjustments in the per-arch Kconfigs that enable
discontigmem without NUMA and then make it a strict requirement (or
CONFIG_BROKEN) until the additional problems are solved in other places in
the kernel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists