[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1105041205340.18728@trent.utfs.org>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 12:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com,
minchan.kim@...il.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks
On Wed, 4 May 2011 at 21:12, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> Ok, that will be helpful. Also helpful is that I've (FINALLY!)
>> reproduced this myself, and i think i can now reproduce it at will
>> on a highmem i686 machine. I'll look into it more later tonight....
I've tried to reproduce it on an SMP i686 with 1024MB RAM, but there was
no OOM there.
> And here's a patch for you to try. It fixes the problem on my test
> machine.....
Excellent! After one run with that patch, the machine does not go OOM any
more when running du(1) over this XFS filesystem.
I've run du(1) login with my oom-debug script to gather sysrq-w and
slabinfo, see https://trent.utfs.org/p/bits/2.6.39-rc4/oom/trace/16-* for
the details.
I'll poke it a bit more over the day, but your patch (one line only! Wow!)
seems to help.
Thanks so much,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #160:
non-redundant fan failure
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists