linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] data integrity: Stabilize pages during writeback for ext4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 May 2011 13:00:31 -0700
From:	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
To:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mingming Cao <mcao@...ibm.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] data integrity: Stabilize pages during
	writeback for ext4

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:21:55PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Excerpts from Christoph Hellwig's message of 2011-05-04 14:46:44 -0400:
> > This seems to miss out on a lot of the generic functionality like
> > write_cache_pages and block_page_mkwrite and just patch it into
> > the ext4 copy & paste variants.  Please make sure your patches also
> > work for filesystem that use more of the generic functionality like
> > xfs or ext2 (the latter one might be fun for the mmap case).
> 
> Probably after the block_commit_write in block_page_mkwrite()

Yes, I'm working on providing more generic fixes for ext3 & friends too, but
they're not really working yet, so I was posting the parts that fix ext4, since
they seem usable.

> Another question is, do we want to introduce a wait_on_stable_page_writeback()?
> 
> This would allow us to add a check against the bdi requesting stable
> pages.

Sounds like a good idea.

> > Also what's the status of btrfs?  I remembered there was one or two
> > bits missing despite doing the right thing in most areas.
> 
> As far as I know btrfs is getting it right.  The only bit missing is the
> one Nick Piggin pointed out where it is possible to change mmap'd O_DIRECT
> memory in flight while a DIO is in progress.  Josef has a test case that
> demonstrates this.
> 
> Nick had a plan to fix it, but it involved redoing the get_user_pages
> api.

I ran the same six tests A-F on btrfs and it reported -ENOSPC with 1% of the
space used, though until it did that I didn't see any checksum errors.

--D
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/