[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105041309001.24395@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 13:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allocate memory cgroup structures in local nodes
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > The vmalloc_node() calls ensure that the nid is actually set in
> > N_HIGH_MEMORY and fails otherwise (we don't fallback to using vmalloc()),
> > so it looks like the failures for alloc_pages_exact_node() and
> > vmalloc_node() would be different? Why do we want to fallback for one and
> > not the other?
>
> The right order would be to try everything (alloc_pages + vmalloc)
> to get it node local, before trying everything else. Right now that's
> not how it's done.
>
Completely agreed, I think that's how it should be patched instead of only
touching the alloc_pages() allocation; we care much more about local node
than whether we're using vmalloc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists