[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=NMp-bPGLgTP9OJnROasx3Q9Rqgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 17:14:43 -0700
From: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tracing: Don't call wakeup() when committing the event
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 04:27:22PM -0700, Vaibhav Nagarnaik wrote:
>> How about this? Check if the waitqueue is active and if true, operate on the
>> trace_wait queue.
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> index 06f4458..e03ee24 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ void trace_wake_up(void)
>> {
>> int cpu;
>>
>> - if (trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_BLOCK)
>> + if (trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_BLOCK || !waitqueue_active(&trace_wait))
>> return;
>> /*
>> * The runqueue_is_locked() can fail, but this is the best we
>>
>
> Hehe, seems it should work :)
>
> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>
Thanks for reviewing the change. I have sent an updated patch with a better
commit message and your Ack.
Vaibhav Nagarnaik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists