linux-kernel - [PATCH 18/18] virtio_net: limit xmit polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5964e2f3d6aac5cd48f467848eed6570517470ef.1304541919.git.mst@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 May 2011 23:53:13 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Carsten Otte <cotte@...ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	linux390@...ibm.com, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Shirley Ma <xma@...ibm.com>, lguest@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <tahm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, steved@...ibm.com,
	habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 18/18] virtio_net: limit xmit polling

Current code might introduce a lot of latency variation
if there are many pending bufs at the time we
attempt to transmit a new one. This is bad for
real-time applications and can't be good for TCP either.

Free up just enough to both clean up all buffers
eventually and to be able to xmit the next packet.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c |   18 +++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index f33c92b..9982bd7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -509,17 +509,23 @@ again:
 	return received;
 }
 
-static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+static bool free_old_xmit_skbs(struct virtnet_info *vi, int capacity)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	unsigned int len;
+	bool c;
+	/* We try to free up at least 2 skbs per one sent, so that we'll get
+	 * all of the memory back if they are used fast enough. */
+	int n = 2;
 
-	while ((skb = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->svq, &len)) != NULL) {
+	while ((c = virtqueue_get_capacity(vi->svq) >= capacity) && --n > 0 &&
+	       (skb = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->svq, &len)) != NULL) {
 		pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
 		vi->dev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
 		vi->dev->stats.tx_packets++;
 		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
 	}
+	return c;
 }
 
 static int xmit_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -574,8 +580,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
 	int capacity;
 
-	/* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */
-	free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
+	/* Free enough pending old buffers to enable queueing new ones. */
+	free_old_xmit_skbs(vi, 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS);
 
 	/* Try to transmit */
 	capacity = xmit_skb(vi, skb);
@@ -609,9 +615,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 		netif_stop_queue(dev);
 		if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(vi->svq))) {
 			/* More just got used, free them then recheck. */
-			free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
-			capacity = virtqueue_get_capacity(vi->svq);
-			if (capacity >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
+			if (!likely(free_old_xmit_skbs(vi, 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS))) {
 				netif_start_queue(dev);
 				virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->svq);
 			}
-- 
1.7.5.53.gc233e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/