linux-kernel - Re: [block IO crash] Re: 2.6.39-rc5-git2 boot crashs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105042325500.3005@ionos>
Date:	Wed, 4 May 2011 23:40:33 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	werner <w.landgraf@...ru>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [block IO crash] Re: 2.6.39-rc5-git2 boot crashs

On Wed, 4 May 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > The problem is that cmpxchg *IS*NOT*AN*CMPXCHG*AT*ALL*. Not even on UP.
> 
> Btw, the really sad thing is that as far as I can tell, the
> cmpxchg64_local() function that we define actually gets this *right*,
> with a helper function that actually works (and disables interrupts)
> and all the alternative_io() stuff to then use the right instruction
> automatically if the CPU supports it, rather than making it a
> hardcoded decision.
> 
> But we don't use it, because the "percpu_cmpxchg8b_double()" code
> rolls its own inferior version, and has slightly different semantics
> (ie the whole "return value success" thing).

Yeah, I tripped over that as well. And the new shiny extra
CONFIG_CMPXCHG_DOUBLE misfeature Christoph nailed together is just
ignoring it as well. It's just more useless #ifdef and CONFIG bloat.

That whole this_cpu_* stuff seems to be designed by committee. A quick
grep shows that max. 10% of the implemented macro hell is actually
used. Can we get rid of all unused ones and bring them back when they
are actually required?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/