[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 19:57:13 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time: Add locking to xtime access in get_seconds()
> I suspect the reason this hasn't been triggered on x86 or power6 is due
> to compiler or processor optimizations reordering the assignment to in
> effect make it atomic. Or maybe the timing window to see the issue is
> harder to observe?
On x86 all aligned stores are atomic. So I don't see how this
could be a problem ever.
Are you saying that on P6 only atomic stores are atomic?
If that's the case again I suspect other code will be affected
too.
-Andi
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists