[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 15:01:20 -0400
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
To: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags
On 05/05/2011 02:54 PM, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> Il 04/05/2011 19:58, Josef Bacik ha scritto:
>> + if (offset>= i_size_read(inode)) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + }
>> + offset = i_size_read(inode);
>> + break;
>
> Here maybe it's possible to use offset bigger than i_size, because
> i_size_read is "atomic" but something can happen between two calls,
> isn't it?
>
We're holding the i_mutex so we are safe, i_size_read is used just for
consistency sake. Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists