| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 01:06:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com> cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>, David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Change trap definitions to enumerated values On Thu, 5 May 2011, Vaibhav Nagarnaik wrote: > Steven > > This patch has the formatting as you suggested. Does this work for you? > > Thomas > > Can you please take a look at the patches and provide your comments? Can you please stop that nonsense ? You posted the patch on Tuesday, sent a reminder on Wednesday and another one on Thursday. Do you really think that I'm a robot waiting for your patches to magically surface on LKML and then dropping any other activity to take care of them ? I have seen that patch and it's in my list to take care of, just not a top priority level issue. It's neither a bug fix nor anything which radically improves the kernel. So what? I don't mind a polite reminder after a week or two in case I actually missed a patch, but that daily reminder is just a PITA. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists