[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110506001210.154922389@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 17:11:01 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: [patch 29/38] mac80211: fix SMPS debugfs locking
2.6.38-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
commit 243e6df4ed919880d079d717641ad699c6530a03 upstream.
The locking with SMPS requests means that the
debugs file should lock the mgd mutex, not the
iflist mutex. Calls to __ieee80211_request_smps()
need to hold that mutex, so add an assertion.
This has always been wrong, but for some reason
never been noticed, probably because the locking
error only happens while unassociated.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
net/mac80211/cfg.c | 2 ++
net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
@@ -1471,6 +1471,8 @@ int __ieee80211_request_smps(struct ieee
enum ieee80211_smps_mode old_req;
int err;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&sdata->u.mgd.mtx);
+
old_req = sdata->u.mgd.req_smps;
sdata->u.mgd.req_smps = smps_mode;
--- a/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c
@@ -172,9 +172,9 @@ static int ieee80211_set_smps(struct iee
if (sdata->vif.type != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- mutex_lock(&local->iflist_mtx);
+ mutex_lock(&sdata->u.mgd.mtx);
err = __ieee80211_request_smps(sdata, smps_mode);
- mutex_unlock(&local->iflist_mtx);
+ mutex_unlock(&sdata->u.mgd.mtx);
return err;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists