[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110506061353.GA21742@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 08:13:53 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LPPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"v2.6.33.." <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc, hw_breakpoints: Fix CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
off-case in ptrace_set_debugreg
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> We make use of ptrace_get_breakpoints() / ptrace_put_breakpoints()
> to protect ptrace_set_debugreg() even if CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
> if off. However in this case, these APIs are not implemented.
>
> To fix this, push the protection down inside the relevant ifdef.
> Best would be to export the code inside CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
> into a standalone function to cleanup the ifdefury there and call
> the breakpoint ref API inside. But as it is more invasive, this
> should be rather made in an -rc1.
>
> Fixes:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c:1594: error: implicit declaration of function 'ptrace_get_breakpoints'
> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Error 2
> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
Thanks.
I'll need a PowerPC ack for this. Note: it's dependent on hw-breakpoint fixes
in tip:perf/urgent so the commit will want to go there too.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists