linux-kernel - Re: [Stable-review] [12/28] x86, cpu: Clean up AMD erratum 400 workaround

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 May 2011 09:41:20 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, bp@...64.org
Subject: Re: [Stable-review] [12/28] x86, cpu: Clean up AMD erratum 400
 workaround

Hey Ben,

On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:53:02PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:29:15AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > We got a few new quirks added for AMD hardware platforms that fix
> > > problems.
> > 
> > Maybe, but I still haven't seen anyone explain what those problems are!
> 
> I'll let the AMD people answer this.

it's hard to follow back in this thread to what exactly you'd like to
have answered. Can you please repeat your questions concerning the AMD
backports? Is it, per chance, about Erratum 400 CPU f/m/s ranges that
got changed?

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/