linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] avr32: add some more at91 to cpu.h definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 May 2011 14:28:30 +0200
From:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com>,
	kernel@...32linux.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avr32: add some more at91 to cpu.h definition

On 14:31 Fri 06 May     , Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 06/05/2011 14:04, Hans-Christian Egtvedt :
> > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:08 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >> Somme common drivers will need those at91 cpu_is_xxx() definitions.
> >> Those definitions are already in Linus' tree so if we want to use them
> >> in common drivers, we will need them in AVR32 cpu.h file.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> > 
> > Will you push this update for 2.6.39? I don't have anything for Linus
> > right now.
> 
> Ah, Linus has just pulled from our tree...
> Maybe we can wait a few days to see if some fixes have to be pushed
> upstream before -final...
> 
> > Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com>
> > with one comment...
I've a bug fix for udc but nothing more
maybe map_io fix can go now

Best Regards,
J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/