linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] wireless: Make and use const struct ieee80211

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1304698221.11874.6.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date:	Fri, 06 May 2011 09:10:21 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Cc:	libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	orinoco-users@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	orinoco-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] wireless: Make and use const struct
 ieee80211_channel

On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 09:19 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:21:47PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 14:49 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> > > These patches generated a lot of warnings in net/mac80211.  Did you
> > > actually build them?
> > Yes.
> > Did you apply patch 1/2 first?
> > It's a dependent patch.
> That's the one that cause most of the warnings...

Consider the 2 patches as a single patch.
Do you have new build warnings after applying both
patches 1 and 2?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/