lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 6 May 2011 16:31:48 -0700
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, allen.kao@...eros.com,
	roman.gezikov@...eros.com, joonas.viskari@...eros.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] misc: add Atheros ar1520 GPS support

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> Last time this driver came up the answer was that the userspace was
> proprietary and this was in fact part of a mixed user/kernel driver which
> seemed to raise all sorts of interesting questions.
>
> This was NAKked before for that reason so why the resubmit. Kernel policy
> is clear enough ?

I was not aware such a patch was even submitted before..

>> + * You need a userspace application to cooperate with this driver. It and
>> + * more information about this driver can be obtained here:
>> + *
>> + * http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ar5120
>
> Which says:
>
> Userspace application
>
> This driver requires a userspace application which will interact with the
> driver via ioctl. More information on this to be posted later.
>
> So NAK

Umm, yeah, also unaware there was no userspace app which was open that
was going to be provided, sorry about that, I'll check with the
team...

> Let's see an open userspace and then this driver can be submitted
>
> +               time =
>  wait_event_interruptible_timeout(ar1520_data->wait_irq,
> +
>  ar1520_data->irq_rx, +
>  msecs_to_jiffies(3142));
>
> Why 3142 ?

Really arbitrary as pi is, this didn't have a timeout before so I just
added this for now. Was hoping Roman or Joonas can better estimate a
better value here.

> Come to think of it why not fixes the races while you are it.

Sure.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ