linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][WAS:bcmai,axi] bcma: add Broadcom specific AMBA bus driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1304776555.16344.2.camel@maggie>
Date:	Sat, 07 May 2011 15:55:55 +0200
From:	Michael Büsch <m@...s.ch>
To:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Michael Büsch <mb@...sch.de>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
	George Kashperko <george@...u.edu.ua>,
	Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Botting <andy@...ybotting.com>,
	linuxdriverproject <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][WAS:bcmai,axi] bcma: add Broadcom specific AMBA bus
 driver

On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 15:34 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: 
> 2011/5/6 Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>:
> > 2011/5/6 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> >>> +const char *bcma_device_name(u16 coreid)
> >>> +{
> >>> +     switch (coreid) {
> >>> +     case BCMA_CORE_OOB_ROUTER:
> >>> +             return "OOB Router";
> >>> +     case BCMA_CORE_INVALID:
> >>> +             return "Invalid";
> >>> +     case BCMA_CORE_CHIPCOMMON:
> >>> +             return "ChipCommon";
> >>> +     case BCMA_CORE_ILINE20:
> >>> +             return "ILine 20";
> >>
> >> It's better to make that a data structure than a switch() statement,
> >> both from readability and efficiency aspects.
> >
> > Well, maybe. We call it only once, at init time. In any case we're
> > still waiting for Broadcom to clarify which cores are really used for
> > BCMA.
> 
> Arnd: did you have a look at defines at all?
> 
> Most of the defines have values in range 0x800 → 0x837. Converting
> this to array means loosing 0x800 u16 entries. We can not use 0x800
> offset, because there are also some defined between 0x000 and 0x800:
> #define BCMA_CORE_OOB_ROUTER           0x367   /* Out of band */
> #define BCMA_CORE_INVALID              0x700
> 
> Oh and there is still:
> #define BCMA_CORE_DEFAULT              0xFFF
> we could want to include. Then we would loose additional (0xFFF -
> 0x837) u16 entries in array.
> 
> I'll just leave this huge "case". As I said, it's called only once on
> initialization time. For standard PCI cards there are usually 3-5
> cores, for embedded systems this number can be bigger, but still is
> limited with 16 for 1 bus:
> #define BCMA_MAX_NR_CORES              16

The compiler does a better job than we do. I'm pretty sure that the
compiler will implement this switch statement as a series of small
lookup tables combined with some branches, if it thinks it's worth
it (also depends on flags and arch).

-- 
Greetings Michael.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/