lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <E8D326F6-7E52-4A20-87B3-6C4CC34406C4@freescale.com>
Date:	Sat, 7 May 2011 11:21:16 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@...escale.com>
To:	Xu Lei <B33228@...escale.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: portdrv: fix irq initialization on FSL pcie host controller


On Apr 28, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Xu Lei wrote:

> 
> 	Any feedback on this patch? Thanks.
> 
> On Friday, 2011-04-22 at 15:43 +0800, Lei Xu wrote:
>> Root complex ports for Freescale PCIe host controller only receive
>> interrupts, so if there is no irq setting for RC, it should not return
>> error, otherwise it may result the PCIe host controller is disabled.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Lei Xu <B33228@...escale.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c |    5 ++++-
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> index 595654a..95e64c8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> @@ -209,7 +209,10 @@ static int init_service_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int *irqs, int mask)
>> 		irqs[i] = irq;
>> 	irqs[PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_VC_SHIFT] = -1;
>> 
>> -	if (irq < 0)
>> +	/* Root complex ports for Freescale PCIe host controller only
>> +	 * receive interrupts, so if there is no irq setting for RC,
>> +	 * it should not return error. */
>> +	if ((irq < 0) && (dev->pcie_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT))
>> 		return -ENODEV;
>> 	return 0;
>> }
> 
> -- 
> Regards
> 
> Lei
> 

Reviewing this in more detail this is not the right solution.  We should have an dev->irq set and need to fix that.

The means to accomplish that is by fixing up the device tree to properly get the interrupt assigned to the root complex node.

- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ