[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201105081133.50824.sven@narfation.org>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 11:33:48 +0200
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
To: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-m32r@...linux-m32r.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cris-kernel@...s.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-am33-list@...hat.com,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atomic: add *_dec_not_zero
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
[...]
> Do we need atomic_dec_not_zero() et.al. in every arch header - is there no
> generic header which it could be added to?
Mike Frysinger already tried to answer it in
<BANLkTimctgbto3dsnJ3d3r7NggS0KF9_Sw@...l.gmail.com>:
> that's what asm-generic is for. if the arch isnt using it, it's
> either because the arch needs to convert to it, or they're using SMP
> and asm-generic doesnt yet support that for atomic.h.
>
> for example, the Blackfin port only needed updating for the SMP case.
> in the non-SMP case, we're getting the def from asm-generic/atomic.h.
> -mike
Feel free to change that but I just followed the style used by all other
macros and will not redesign the complete atomic*.h idea.
thanks,
Sven
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists