[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DC6910F.2020008@hauke-m.de>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 14:48:15 +0200
From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
CC: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Michael Büsch <mb@...sch.de>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
George Kashperko <george@...u.edu.ua>,
Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Botting <andy@...ybotting.com>,
linuxdriverproject <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][WAS:bcmai,axi] bcma: add Broadcom specific AMBA bus driver
On 05/05/2011 11:59 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
.....
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/bcma_private.h
.....
> +
> +#define BCMA_ADDR_BASE 0x18000000
> +#define BCMA_WRAP_BASE 0x18100000
> +
......
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/scan.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> +#ifndef BCMA_SCAN_H_
> +#define BCMA_SCAN_H_
> +
> +#define BCMA_ADDR_BASE 0x18000000
> +#define BCMA_WRAP_BASE 0x18100000
> +
.....
While graping through the code I found this. BCMA_ADDR_BASE and
BCMA_WRAP_BASE are defined twice.
Why are some constants defined in purpose specific headers in
drivers/bcma/*.h like drivers/bcma/scan.h and some in
drivers/bcma/bcma_private.h and other in include/linux/bcma/bcma_regs.h ?
Hauke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists